<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Old Testament Studies &#187; Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/category/theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:33:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interpreting the Book of Proverbs (Part 12)</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 02:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proverbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With parts 10 and 11 of this series, I examined the theological framework of Proverbs. In this post and the next, we will look at the sixth guideline for interpreting Proverbs: problematic passages in Proverbs should be interpreted by the rest of Scripture.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Nature of the Noahic Flood</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/the-nature-of-the-noahic-flood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/the-nature-of-the-noahic-flood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week on Monday eveming, we finished our Biblical Creationism class . We looked at the ninth of ten lessons in my 121-page syllabus. This lesson is on "the Nature of the Noahic Flood." The initial part of this lesson covers seven biblical reasons supporting the global nature of the Genesis Flood. We treated these reasons in the first part of our class. In the second part we looked at a DVD on the Grand Canyon and Noah's Flood.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/the-nature-of-the-noahic-flood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interpreting the Book of Proverbs (Part 11)</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proverbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last post of this series on Proverbs, we looked at the first of two parts dealing with the theological framework of Proverbs. With this post, we will examine the second part.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death &amp; Decay in Genesis 3</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/death-decay-in-genesis-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/death-decay-in-genesis-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you study God's perfect creation in Genesis 1, it is hard to harmonize it with the world that we live in today. However, Genesis 3 provides an explanation for our tension. Last Monday evening we examined Genesis 3, as well as a few other relevant biblical texts, to see how and when death and decay entered in the created order. The point of this examination was to demonstrate that disease, suffering, and death did not become a part of God’s good universe until God's vice-regent, Adam ate from the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/death-decay-in-genesis-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creation of Adam and Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/creation-of-adam-and-eve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/creation-of-adam-and-eve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of academic and domestic commitments, I have been delinquent in blogging about my Biblical Creation class. Nevertheless, I need to pick up about our recent lesson that focused on the creation of Adam and Eve. With this post, I will summarize our discussion.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/creation-of-adam-and-eve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interpreting the Book of Proverbs (Part 10)</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-9-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-9-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proverbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In part nine of this series on interpreting Proverbs, we finished looking at the fourth guideline that focused on looking for literary clues. In the next two posts, we will look at the book's theological framework to assist with interpreting individual passages.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/interpreting-the-book-of-proverbs-part-9-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 1:1–2 Represented in Young Earth Creationism</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/genesis-11%e2%80%932-represented-in-young-earth-creationism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/genesis-11%e2%80%932-represented-in-young-earth-creationism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=2000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past Monday in Biblical Creationism, we wrapped up our examination of old-earth re-creationist models followed by a presentation about how Genesis 1:1–2 ties in with young earth creationism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/genesis-11%e2%80%932-represented-in-young-earth-creationism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Earth Re-Creationist Models that Interpret the Days of the Creation Week Literally</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/old-earth-re-creationist-models-that-interpret-the-days-of-the-creation-week-literally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/old-earth-re-creationist-models-that-interpret-the-days-of-the-creation-week-literally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=1995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past two Monday evenings in our Biblical Creation class, we started covering old-earth creation models that interpret the days of Genesis 1 literally. More specifically we started looking at the Gap Theory by describing and evaluating this hypothesis.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/old-earth-re-creationist-models-that-interpret-the-days-of-the-creation-week-literally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Rice Lecture Series</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/2010-rice-lecture-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/2010-rice-lecture-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispensationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday at Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary's annual lecture series, we were privileged to have as our guest lecturer Dr. Michael Vlach from The Master's Seminary. He is a current leader in Dispensational Theology.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/2010-rice-lecture-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Earth Creationism: Figurative Interpretations of the Days of Creation (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/old-earth-creationism-figurative-interpretations-of-the-days-of-creation-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/old-earth-creationism-figurative-interpretations-of-the-days-of-creation-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminary Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/?p=1950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past Monday in my Biblical Creation class, I finished covering my fourth lesson that focused on four figurative interpretations of the days of creation week. In our class we covered three areas of weakness and a questionable presupposition with four figurative interpretations. With this post, I will summarize four items: a hermeneutical inconsistency, an inconsistency with the perspicuity of Scripture, undermining the fall of Adam &#038; the Edenic Curse, and presuppositions &#038; biblical interpretation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldtestamentstudies.org/old-earth-creationism-figurative-interpretations-of-the-days-of-creation-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

